Charities in the Pandemic

Charities and the Charity Retail Association (CRA) are pleading for more sector specific assistance  from the UK government in the light of the current pandemic.  This is designed to help replace some of the income from public fundraising, investment income, foundation income, contract income and income from the private sector. All very well but more self-help is also called for.

  • Many parts of the charity sector have long been focused on growing and extending their scope and coverage and now may be a good time to focus on core activities and virus generated need.
  • Some larger charities should adopt smaller well focused organisations and give them preferential support and help.
  • There are dramatic reserves and financial resources in many often older charities that are not well utilised. They should be repurposed and spent to help alleviate suffering caused by the current plague.
  • Internationally financial management is in disarray and will continue for some time. Now is not the time for charities to ‘hunker down’ as their reserves plummet but rather to anticipate realistic support for rebuilding after to problems abate.

MP’s and charity support organisations ask for more help.


Charities Performing In The Dark

You wouldn’t think that large national charities could turn away lucrative sponsorship and corporate membership but that is what the The RSC (212481) and The Royal National Theater (224223) are doing. The financial contributions from BP, Shell and Equinor are no longer acceptable according to climate change activists and these  ‘national treasures’ charities have bowed to their demands.

Other publicly supported organisations including the Science Museum group, The National Gallery and the British Museum are also potentially being targeted.

Comment and Concerns

  • I assume all future performances will be undertaken without the use of light and heating which has been generated from fossil fuels!
  • The public purse should not be used to fill the funding gaps created by the virtue signalling rejection of BP and Shell’s funding support. The charities should now ‘cut their cloth’ appropriately.
  • Are trustees acting in the best interests of their charities

The Center Point of Ramsbury Manor Charity

The center of this charity and it’s co-charity the Capricorn Foundation 1135174 is the income from Harry Hyams estate. Income of £440million pounds of cash and assets has been received including a £250 million debt from the estate.

Harry Hyams was a post war property magnate who built the London landmark Center Point. He built an extensive art collection from his property dealings despite suffering one of the countries largest burglaries in 2008.

Despite a life time seeking privacy and a reluctance to court publicity his collection of paintings, antiques and vintage vehicles are to be displayed to the public at his  home Ramsbury Manor.


Is it churlish to question why the ‘In the Trustees’ opinion, the Capricorn Foundation as an unincorporated charity, is not a suitable vehicle for running an operational heritage charity with public access.
They have therefore set up an incorporated charity named the Ramsbury Manor Foundation (charity registration
number 10874451) for this purpose.’ Doubtless there are inheritance and taxation issues involved.

It was Mr Hyams’ wish that the Ramsbury Manor estate and the collections should be conserved and made available for public enjoyment and education. Let us hope it is made available quicker than was the case with Center point office space.


Woke up to a Joke

Who is the Joke On?

In a ‘Dave’ poll the winner of the best Joke at the Edinburgh Fringe was Sweden’s 8th best comedian Olaf Falafel’s gag, “I keep randomly shouting out ‘Broccoli’ and ‘Cauliflower’ – I think I might have florets”.

But a support  charity Tourettes Action, Reg Charity no: 1003317 aka Tourette Syndrome (UK) Association for people with Tourette’s has taken offence.  Suzanne Dobson Chief Executive has highlighted the gag as “cheap” and said it did little more than to reinforce stereotypes of those who are “extremely stigmatised”.

Next in line for criticism was Garry Lineker and the BBC. The offensive banter quote was ‘It’s a strong start to the Premier League season. Real hair-raising stuff at time…  unless you are  Alan Shearer and Danny Murphy’ . This caused at least one minor complaint to the BBC and for charity  1111304 – ALOPECIA UK to talk to a newspaper.  A spokes person is quoted in the Daily Telegraph ‘jokes about physical attributes are extremely outdated and this includes banter about hair loss’.


  • If you subscribe to the views that ‘The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.’ and ‘All publicity is good publicity.’ then managed outrage can give a charity a useful public platform.
  • It is unlikely that public awareness would have increased about the medical conditions if the charities concerned and the media had not risen to the bait.





Whistle Blowing Scares the Horses

210504 – The British Horse Society is the UK’s largest membership-based equine charity.
They have had their troubles recently including  points for a refusal with trustees allegedly refusing to take complaints seriously.
There are fences down as a result of  more than its fair share of ‘Whistle-blowers’ (great horse name). That is supported by the number of non disclosure agreements (NDAs) and industrial tribunals which is indicative of a particular culture.
‘Sour grapes’ (great horse name) from the  former marketing department may just be ‘stirring up trouble’ (great horse name) but there are questions to be answered following a recent study by the Charities Commission.
‘Falling at the last fence’, Lynn Peterson chief executive, announced her retirement from  the BHS  after media stories accused the charity of having a “toxic culture”. ‘Scapegoat’ would be another great horse name.
The 2018 accounts would normally be available on the charity commission web site around this time and we wait with ‘baited horse breath’ (great horse name). Money has been spent on  Lawyers and PWC defending various claims diluting the charitable impact of the society.


More grief at ‘this national treasure of a charity’. The London South East branch of the RSPCA is being investigated over suspected fraud of hundreds of thousands of pounds after 2 people were arrested. Less than 12 months ago the Maidstone branch were criticised by the charity commission for allowing the local chairman’s daughter to manage and live in a cattery without the right authority or controls. In the recent past we have reported on Big Ugly Animals at RSPCA and RSPCA Still Getting It Wrong The charity commission is doing what it can to curb the excesses of this charity but it makes you wonder.


It is time the public wised up and called the RSPCA to account. Only hitting them in the purse will register.

A break up of the charity should be actively considered

Significant punishments for the guilty should be widely broadcast and not covered up by PR messages and media speak.

Why Sack the Sacklers

A  frenzy is taking place around the Sackler Trust and the belief that the trust’s funds arise from the abusive sale of the habit forming drug OxyContin. This drug has been sold for years by the Sackler family’s company Purdue Pharma. There are several high profile legal cases in America blaming the company for high levels of addiction. Should this affect the charity?

Previous Sackler Donations (examples)

  • The V&A the Sackler Courtyard,
  • The National Theater the Sackler Pavilion
  • The Royal Academy of Arts  the Sackler Galleries
  • The National Gallery the Sackler Room
  • Oxford University the Sackler Library
  • Sadler’s Wells’ Sackler meeting room
  • The Globe Sackler education studios
  • Alexandra Palace a new creative learning zone

Now the National Portrait Gallery, The Prince’s Trust and the Tate have decided not to accept or seek donations from the trust.


  • Is this just virtue signalling that has little consequence for the addiction problems. Is this a media storm in a tea cup stirred by ‘squeamish’ trustees.
  • It is interesting that so much of the support has been given to  ‘state art’ organisations. Who will fill the funding void.
  • The OxyContin drug  continues to have significant medical benefits when  correctly prescribed and administered.
  • The trustees of the Sackler Trust UK Charity no. 1132097 say they ‘have taken the difficult decision to temporarily pause all new philanthropic giving, while still honouring existing commitments.’

Missing from a Children’s Home or Just Missing

Sometimes you come across a charity that you hope you never need. ‘Missing people’ captured my imagination for no apparent reason although they ran a list of missing people in the last Big Issue.

Charity number 1020419 ‘Missing People’ offers a lifeline for the 250,000 people who run away and go missing each year. For those left behind, they search and provide specialised support to end the heartache and confusion.’

Missing Children Europe is a European federation for missing and sexually exploited children. They operate   a European hotline telephone number 116 000  for missing children. The hotline is currently operational in all EU Member States with the above number  handled in the UK by Missing People.

This follows on from this months launch of an inquiry by the All Party Group for Runaway and Missing Children and Adults. Their report supported by the Department of Education says that 64%  of children living in children’s homes are living out of borough and of those 1990 children went missing last year, more than double the 2015 total. Anne Coffey, (MP for Stockport) and the groups chairman said, ‘Isolated and alone without family or friends they become prey targets for paedophiles and drug gangs and can become trapped in a brutal world. The children’s homes system is broken and catastrophically failing children and young people….’


  • Didn’t we learn when we sent children to Australia and Canada? Then at least there was a war going on.
  • Aren’t we learning when there are regular media reports of abuse, human trafficking and commercial sexual exploitation.
  • Time for constructive action and greater moral fiber, not more inquiries.

‘No Room for Racism’ or ‘Kick it Out’

Kick it Out is the 25 year old charity ‘campaigning for  Equality in Football’.  The Football Association, the Premier League, the Professional Footballers’ Association, and the English Football League are all part of Kick It Out’s core funders.

The premier league have announced it’s own campaign ‘No Room for Racism’ which will include branded promotional material and social media activity over the next few weeks. These weeks are traditionally a time set aside for Kick it Out. The funding from the premier league last season was £270,000 – not a large sum in the context of current issues. Future funding is still to be agreed for for the next cycle.


  • The timing of this activity by the  premier league appears to be a bit offside. There could have been extra time to sort out the fixture conflict.
  • Kick it Out may have scored an own goal arising from a current  Charity Commission review of staff complaints. Let’s hope there is no penalty.
  • The goals should be the same for the good of the sport and wider society and we all wish for a win-win.

Fund Raiser’s Targeting Tactics for Church of England?

We have all suspected charities target products and specific sectors of society to obtain increased donations.  So it shouldn’t come as a shock that the Church Of England looks set to increase their use these tactics. In fact a twitter storm and media frenzy has just started.

Employing (in the loosest term) a new professional fund raising chief the Church is using someone who has urged charities to aim at the ‘forgetful’ and target ‘single, elderly, poor females’. Jonathan de Bernhardt Wood (aka Jonathan Farnhill) is the author of The Porcupine Principle a 2007 book that sought to show and use the  motivations of people who give.

Through case studies the book emphasises the benefit to a charity of donation by regular standing orders on the assumption that we tend to forget. That may explain some of the chugging harassment you still see on the high street. In a church context a direct debit to the ‘Parish Giving Scheme’ may appropriately be for life.  In another section Jonathan de Bernhardt Wood explains ‘those most likely no leave legacies to charities are single, elderly, poor females  …. and to target those most vulnerable to our fundraising messages’. A case of believing the end justifies the means.

On the Positive Side

  1. Jonathan de Bernhardt Wood,  became the Church of England’s National Advisor on Giving and Income Generation in January 2019 Previously he has been the Chief Executive, Chair and or trustee of various charities involved with deafness and audiology. As the Diocese of Oxford’s Generous Giving Adviser, Jonathan de Bernhardt Wood, he published Reflections on Living Generously a more wholesome view of religious charity in its true sense.  PDF
  2. In a further extract from  The Porcupine Principle he postulates  ‘What we do matters. Giving money is not some pointless exercise to assuage comfortable, middle-class guilt. It makes a difference and will continue to make a difference in perpetuity. How do you incorporate this within your giving message? By making sure that you show how generosity ripples outwards.
    Do not stop at saying a donation will take a homeless person off the streets. Talk about what they will do when they are off the streets. Who will they meet and what will they do? What acts of goodness will they now be able to do? Too often we end up talking about the process for achieving change, not the change itself.’
  3. It is better  to be informed about fund raising tactics and be in possession of the facts when considering donations and legacies.



It Takes Two to Tandem

1107331 – OPEN COUNTRY is a 30 year old northern based charity whose objective is to enable anyone with a disability to access the countryside. They achieve this through a variety of countryside activities including supported cycling and the provision of information, training and advice.

Thankfully 59 organisations including donors, public sector groups, charities and companies have supported this charity in the year to 31st March 2018. Let’s hope their insurers and the police are also able to support them and help replace some stolen tandem bikes that the charity recently fund raised for. These bikes were used to promote and protect the physical and mental health of disabled people. Unfortunately some ne’re-do-wells  have stolen some bikes which cost upwards of £1500 each.


  • It is a constant surprise how many people will steal from charities and those in need. How can Britain halt the moral decay that fosters thieving and fraud against charities.
  • Fortunately this charity seems to be well established with about a years cash held in reserves. Hopefully a strong network of support will help them continue the work of supporting the disabled to access and enjoy the countryside.

Indian Tribal Forest Dwellers To Be Evicted

Survival international 267444 is a UK based  human rights organisation campaigning for the rights of indigenous tribal peoples. The head of the organisation Stephen Corry has taken up the cause of over a million tribal people in India. They face  being evicted from their homeland forest and jungle land after a couple of rulings by India’s supreme court. Evictions  are to be executed in the next few months under official and police supervision.

Indian law gave legal rights over forest land  to tribes and forest-dwelling communities provided they could prove their families have stayed there for at least three generations. However in mineral and resource rich areas the ability to defend this right has been heavily compromised.

Not all wildlife groups and conservationists are in favour of the tribes rights and their views have been used in a one sided court case that has brought the current issue to the fore.

‘With more than 700 tribal groups, India is home to over 100 million indigenous people. While the forest land is legally controlled by the government, people have lived in such areas for centuries.’ (Washington Post). Yet over the last 30 years, 5000 square miles of forests  have been lost to encroachments and 24,000 industrial projects.  It is believed that conditions under which these projects are given forest land are widely violated. (Scroll In)


  • This post takes an opportunity to highlight a UK charity with global reach in support of vulnerable people and Traditional Forest Dwelling tribes.
  • The conflicts created by government, business and environmental lobbies can leave ‘tribes’ without any appropriate support or unified voice.
  • In this Indian case it appears that some charities are conflicted and are pursuing action that will positively harm the tribes.

Billionaires Tax and Oxfam’s Poverty Reports

Oxfam no 202918 is a registered charity in England and Wales  and in Scotland SC039042. Oxfam GB is one of 20 members of the international confederation Oxfam.

From accounts just published in respect of 2017/18 Oxfam GB spent £336.9m on charitable work (£173.2m on humanitarian work, £151.6m on  development work and £12m on campaigning. A further £100m was spent on trading costs (net income £18.9m) and fundraising.)

Also just published is a report on equality and poverty saying ‘Last year, the poorest half of the world became 11% poorer, while billionaires’ fortunes rose 12% – or $2.5 billion every day….. The gap between the richest and poorest people is growing.’

Having  a Pop at Billionaires

The poverty report wants to engender a movement that creates a higher tax income from the Super-rich. This simplistic approach applies whether they are rich in terms of income or asset values. Rich list Americans like Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Microsoft’s Bill & Miranda Gates, Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Larry Ellison, the Walton family of Walmart fame, Warren Buffett, the Koch brothers and the Mars family who are collectively worth well in excess of $500 billion.

Large corporations systematically hide their corporate profits in overseas tax havens to avoid tax. This is supported by Oxfam research under the headline ‘Drug companies as tax dodgers, price gougers, and influence peddlers that named four pharmaceutical corporations – Abbott, Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co and Pfizer. Tax dodging, high prices, and political influencing by drug companies exacerbate the yawning gap between rich and poor.’


  • Oxfam is going through a turbulent period and interested charity watchers will be pouring over their latest annual reports and accounts. These detail some of the structural changes planned or implemented to restore the recent loss of confidence.
  • Billionaires are an apparently easy target to gain extra resources. Where is the effort to curtail corruption, political incompetence/misfeasance and other forms of oppression which would wastes resources gained from a billionaires tax.
  • Oxfam is a large and potentially cumbersome organisation that in our opinion needs to continue changing and honing down it’s focus to protect the core work that it should do.

Not a Day to be Depressed 21.1.19

Papyrus are led to believe that  21 January 2019  is the most depressing day of the year! With Christmas and New Year over some children and young adults will be going back to school, college or university and dreading the thought.

Rather than accept this Blue Monday, Papyrus suggest you try and have a Soothe Monday. A day ‘ where we can talk about our worries, feelings, mental health, suicidal thoughts. It could be a day we actually listen to people and, instead of taking it for granted when they say they are fine, we ask them again and again until we get an honest answer. It could be A DAY WHEN WE ALSO ACTUALLY LISTEN TO OURSELVES!!!’



This is just one of several laudable campaigns and approaches by Papyrus

Food For Thought – Food from Fighting

In the January news ‘Surplus operational army ration packs’ are to be donated by the Ministry of Defence (MOD) to 1100051 FaresShare. It is anticipated that this food will then be distributed for cooking by local charities to support the needy.

FareShare is a charity consisting of 20 Regional Centres  aimed at relieving food poverty and reducing food waste in the UK. It does this by rescuing good quality surplus food that would otherwise have gone to waste and sending it to almost 10,000 charity and community groups across the United Kingdom

FareShare manages 3 key centres and provides a network of third-party independent of other charities with central support. FareShare also provides a service, known as  FoodCloud, which reduces store level food waste and contributes £2m to the charities income.

Similar Food Sharing Charities to investigate include:
1134423 –  FOODCYCLE


  • The FareShare charity seems to well connected within the sector and to its important supporters.
  • Waste elimination and better use of resources is a political high profile cause and likely to continue attracting attention and support.
  • FareShare externally seems to be financially well set up and in a position to deliver on its objectives.
  • Income from individuals is not critical so in our opinion support should be directed towards the  charities delivering the food and service.

The Power of Appropriate Patrons


‘Through conductive education sessions, children with a variety of motor disorders, including cerebral palsy and dyspraxia,  learn ways in which they can live their lives as independently as possible.  In the same way, we also help adults with parkinson’s and stroke.  These life changing sessions are accessed by families from within the surrounding counties as well as other regions of the country.’

The Power of Patrons

With 2 doctors among the 6 trustees do medical and disability based charities need patrons and ambassadors? Well like many charities the answer is yes. It is essential to improve the awareness, profile and understanding of the charities issues and the objectives they seek to address. That patrons help with fund raising is also a key role for Patrons.

Patrons for Megan Baker House :

Jo Brand,  Lady Foley,  Professor Tamar Thompson OBE,  Sascha Kindred OBE,  Ian Whybrow , Bill Wiggin MP,  Colin Blunstone,  Linda Tolchard . Their ambassadors also include:  Charles Hazlewood and Grant Simmonds.


The charity seems to demonstrate it’s well thought out support to augment a professional team.

Baubles to Charity Christmas Cards

Charity Christmas Cards

As the post Christmas clear up started I  reviewed  a selection of Christmas cards. The sample may be slightly slanted towards our circle of contacts but there are some common themes.

  • 57% 0f all cards had glitter and or foil that rendered them useless for recycling (44% of them were charity cards so they demonstrate slightly more concern for the environment)
  • Only 20% of all cards had a Christian theme and of those the largest group represented carols rather than religious scenes.
  • It appears that 74% of the sample were ‘charity cards’ or so it implies on the reverse of the card. ( That may be open to interpretation see below)
  • Only one e-card (1%) was received and there was little thought demonstrating concern for the environment and recycling.
  • For various reasons it seems as though charities sub-optimise the contribution these cards could make but perhaps rely on buyer inertia.

The Mercenary Bit

  • 70% of the charity cards were for single  individual causes. To me these are ‘true charity cards’. Some would be published on behalf of the charity others self published. It was not practical to understand how these had been sold for example direct through supporters and members or via various retailers. The return to the charity could vary considerably.
  • 30% of cards claimed to be in aid of more than one charity and were generally promoted by single major retailers including supermarkets and chains. These I call  ‘feel good cards’.
    • Two types of charitable fund raising were apparent – the lump sum approach was favoured by Tesco, Morrisons and M&S among others. A fixed donation sum was highlighted on the back of the card of between £50,000 and £350,000.
      That did not seem to relate to the volume or value of the card purchased. Perhaps it related more to the retailers  ‘corporate social responsibility agenda’.
    • The other method, a percentage of sale price was used by  Waitrose and Debenhams  contributing 10-20% or 10p per pack. That is more in line with what a purchasor would expect. The Debenham Foundation reg 1147682 raises over £1.75m over the year on various charitable activities.

Observations & Issues


As with many things the devil is in the detail. Even if it seems Scrooge like the card issue is worth giving some deeper thought.

  • It is my view that some of the charities had settled for an easy contribution to avoid the effort of organising a sensible fund raising operation of their own. Some retailers take a marketing advantage by offering low return for the charity cards sold.
  • Other parts of the supply chain including wholesalers, printers packers etc benefit from the card trade sales but it is unclear if or how they contribute to charity.
  • The cards commissioned for individual charities and those who arrange their own direct sales are likely to make the largest charitable contributions. Admittedly this carries some risk and administrative burdens.
  • No cards appeared to use the ‘promotional opportunity’ to solicit donations, highlight current isues or recruit new supporters with adverts and links.


One card came via a defunct publisher with a strong link to 1124224 – THE PHOENIX INTERNATIONAL CHARITY

In previous years funds of circa £30k per annum  were raised primarily for a range of charities through Christmas card sales made by the publisher ‘phoenix trading’ which went into administration in 2017. This bust outfit morphed into a phoenix itself called Flamingo Paperie for 2018 Christmas card sales. Call me cynical but the claim of ‘in excess of £1,887,000 worldwide fundraising’ beggars belief.



Vegans are Coming

2019 could be the year of the Vegans considering how the media and health industry promoted them at the end of 2018. Along with many others I did not realise the Vegan Society  was a registered charity no 279228.

Their objects are ‘To further knowledge of and interest in sound nutrition and in veganism and the vegan method of agriculture as a means of increasing the potential of the earth to the physical, moral and economic advantage of humankind.
(b) to relieve elderly vegans who are in conditions of need.’ To satisfy these criteria it:-

‘promotes a way of life that seeks to avoid, as far as is possible and practicable, all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose.

It is an education charity providing information and support through publications, talks, interviews, websites and social media. The society advocates for all, including those in vulnerable situations.’

Sources of Annual Income include:-

  • Trademark licensing £755,000
  • Sale of materials promoting veganism £425,000
  • Membership fees £156,000
  • And donations and legacies  £37,000 amongst a total income of £1.46m

Other Comments

  • Gift aid  income curtesy of HMRC was £20,000
  • The auditor who signed a clean set of accounts was the aptly named Patrick Morrello almost after the cherry.
  • In addition to 10 trustees there is an advisory committee and ambassadors that include the vegan poet Benjamin Zephaniah

Political Posturing is Not a Charities Job

The organisations listed below or their representatives have collaborated or even colluded in ‘Brexit politics’ at a sensitive time. They jointly signed a letter published in the Daily Telegraph on 31st December 2018 copy below.

Campaigning charities have the right or even obligation to speak out but only after due consideration. Such a considered policy needs to have full approval within the organisation and logically should relate to current circumstance  rather than matters that are still uncertain. Members of charitable organisations and donors have the right to expect balanced views from their charity or risk alienation of a significant proportion of the stakeholders. This particular letter is emotive and the conclusions drawn are by no means certain.

The Signatories

Mike Clarke RSPB     Stephanie Hilborne The Wildlife Trusts   Beccy Speight Woodland Trust     Shaun Spiers Green Alliance     Crispin Truman Campaign to Protect Rural England    John Sauven Greenpeace   Martin Spray Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust   Craig Bennett Friends of the Earth   James Thornton ClientEarth   Sandy Luk Marine Conservation Society   Nick Mabey E3G    Dr Michael Warhurst CHEM Trust   Helen Browning  Soil Association

SIR – No one who loves Britain’s beautiful countryside, or cares about our environment more generally, should be in any doubt about the disastrous impact of a no-deal Brexit.

We can expect traffic chaos, with the garden of England turning into the lorry park of England. Dangerous chemicals will go unmonitored. Farmers will face huge uncertainty, with high tariffs on exports and livestock stuck at borders. And we will immediately lose the institutions that have ensured cleaner rivers and beaches, and safeguarded important habitats for wildlife.

The Government has promised a “green Brexit”. That depends on continued cooperation with the EU and a mutual commitment to the highest environmental standards. No deal is not an option for a greener UK. (Our highlights)

Opinion and Action

  • I will not renew my membership of some of these organisations
  • I am actively reviewing my support for the other causes signed up to this letter. Those who emphasis ‘doing’ good will be favoured over those who talk an ill timed fight.
  • I will continue to advocate that charities avoid controversial involvement in politics even when I am sympathetic to the underlying issues.

Fact or Fiction – Fake News

As a reader of this blog you probably subscribe to the proverbial view ‘Believe half of what you see, and none of what you hear’. Well there is one charity, with cross political party members of the House of Lords as trustees, who seek to call fiction and fake news to account.
Registered charity no. 1158683 Full Fact seeks to improve the integrity of ‘facts’ quoted by others including politicians and the media.

‘It’s easy to trumpet the facts you care about, far harder to support the ones you don’t.’

Fact checks alone are not enough to halt the spread of misinformation but accurate and balanced information will help.  The charity says ‘It is also necessary to push for corrections where necessary, and work with government departments and research institutions to improve the quality and communication of information at source’.

Like Caesar Wife

  • Full Fact seeks to be beyond reproach and does not employ outside external  fundraisers or employ the kinds of fundraising tactics that give rise to recent public concern.
  • They had no recorded fundraising complaints in 2017.
  • The approach is that donors are a crucial part of the extended Full Fact team and deserve to be treated with respect.
  • They solicit donations from the public on the website and other online channels but are also supported by other charitable trusts. Funders giving more than £5,000 should be listed on the website.

Aspirations for 2019

  • Clear well presented facts reflecting both sides of an argument should be checked and treated with integrity.
  • Admission of any vested interest by public figures and the media.
  • Improved political debate followed by rapid and appropriate action.

Seagrass Spotter

Project Seagrass was created with the mission of turning cutting-edge research into effective conservation action and education schemes, by collaborating with local communities. Seagrass meadows are subsea flowering plants that attract marine life and help fight the bacteria that are killing coral reefs. Seagrass can absorb large amounts of carbon and is a significant contributor in the environment.
During the financial year to 31 March 2018 ‘Project Seagrass received funding from;
a. The Environment Agency Abu Dhabi for the development of The
Dugong and Seagrass Research Toolkit.
b. Natural England for the yearly Isles of Scilly Seagrass Monitoring
c. The Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University for
developments to our seagrass monitoring drone.’


  • Seagrass is slow to grow and is at risk from traditional anchorage methods. The national marine aquarium 1032491 is working on new ecomooring designs.
  • Cooperation among charities is seen as a viable way to optimise return for resources in the Marine environment. see MCS
  • There are plenty of niche charities to support but this may be one to keep an eye on as it develops.

Eye Don’t Believe It


Who Would Be A Charity Auditor

When things are bad they are often worse. Having survived a whistle blowing episode in 2014 and remaining independent of the Age UK consolidation you would expect this charity to take extra care. With new enthusiasm let us hope this is what happens. Extracts from the latest published report and accounts continue the story.

‘Due to the fields of activity in which the charity operates and its trading enterprises, there is a risk that the charity could suffer serious reputational damage as a consequence of the actions of its staff (e.g. in
advocating for clients), volunteers, trustees or its wider interests such as campaigning. This risk is managed by ensuring …. that good governance arrangements are in place (e.g. declarations of interest and governance polices) to ensure all relevant legal, statutory
and regulatory compliance is adhered to.

The Trustees who served during the year to 31″March but have recently resigned were:
A Cannings
B Mittal
R Whitehouse
R Dhokia

R Akwa was appointed to the Board on 26 September 2018.

Post Balance Sheet event
Since the year end, the group concluded negotiations with a major supplier which resulted in the cancellation of certain amounts owed by the charity at the year end. The benefit of this transaction which relates to this financial year end is £105,975 and has been recognised in these financial reports

The amount due from the subsidiary … was unsecured, interest free and there were no fixed terms for repayment. The Trustees have considered the recoverability of this amount which was £321,484 (2017: f325,968) and in the opinion of the Trustees, the full amount should be recoverable and no provision against that amount needs to be made.’

Oddities from a cursory review of the report and accounts lodged with the charities commission include  the worries of a third year of excess costs over income: debtors of quarter of a million pounds when most shop income is taken as and when a sale arises:  Lease commitments lasting beyond 5 years that over time approach one million pounds:  Profit related pay introduced at loss making charity shops Handy Help Ltd


  • Overtrading is a business risk and having opted for a business-charity model this outfit seems to have fallen foul in many ways. Such a badly broken business would be closed, as arguably this charity should be but how do they extract themselves and who will fill the social needs.
  • The charity has a 33% interest in Interhelp Limited the Age Concern company selling insurance and financial products. There is a negative balance sheet and adverse publicity has dogged the project.

A Dickens of a Going on at The Retailers Charity


In the 19th century when Charles Dickens was chairman this charity was called the ‘Warehousemen & Clerk’s School’ subsequently renamed Purley Children’s Trust, The Textile Industry’s  Children’s Trust and now glorying under the current name and focus. It helps the children of folk who have worked for more than a year in clothing retail, clothing manufacture, laundry or fashion.

Even today these sectors seldom offer secure, well paid jobs. In the UK the demise of so many retail outlets and foreign clothes imports has added to the stress such a charity may feel on behalf of their ‘clients’. Indeed they have helped 547 children at a cost of £198,184 this year but currently report on the website ‘…just a quick note to say we know we’ve been a bit quiet on this front recently. We’ve had a few comings and goings over the last few months, so things have been a bit up in the air!   ..’

I wanted a charity in this space where I could be positive and able to help as I can envisage a significant need. Large corporate mismanagement, high street closures, pension and redundancy problems must be depressing for staff in these areas. After looking through their reports and accounts  I have a couple of issues.

  • They have £8,950,000 pounds in reserves potentially built up over many decades of prudent even parsimonious policies and a school sale. At current levels of new grant  money already in the bank could cover 30 years further grants.
  • Have the charity added ‘Fashion’ to be in the fashion of broadening their remit to attract more requests from grantees? Is there an inclination to add to the core charitable remit rather than excelling on the real job to be done.
  • Salary costs are conservative but the ‘cost of raising funds’ at £95k is too high when only £36k is raised from donations and trading. The main 95% of  income comes from historic investment income. Hence there is little or no incentive for new donors to become involved.
  • The 600+ year old Drapers Company 251403 makes grants in similar areas including Education and Young People , Social Welfare and Textiles and Heritage with it’s £65m funds. Despite a higher income, reserves and profile I am still not sure they do a better job.

Dealers in Drugs – Opioids for the Masses

Not all drug dealers have the negative connotations  one associates with street drug suppliers; consider the pharmaceutical based  Welcome Foundation or the Sackler family.

1128926 The Dr Mortimer And Theresa Sackler Foundation’s aims are  ‘the advancement of research and education in England and Wales and
elsewhere in the fields of art, science and medical research.’ The Sacklers funded the Medical Research Center at the University of Cambridge, our School of Clinical Medicine and the Faculty of Medicine at Tel-Aviv university as well as numerous other research programs and fellowships.

The wealth of the $multi-billion families of Raymond and Mortimer Sackler arises from Purdue Pharma a privately owned and operated global company which sells the opiate drug Oxycontin and Oxycodone.

Issues For Purdue Pharma

  • Major health concerns continue to surface about the use and abuse of synthetic opioid drugs. Increased mortality, reduction in life expectancy and more suicide & liver disease are cited.
  • Federal judges in Ohio are allowing public health organisations to sue opioid manufacturers and distributors.
  • In Connecticut the attorney general alleges that ‘the Purdue Pharma’s board and executives made huge financial gains by misleading doctors and patients about how addictive their prescription opioid medications were’.
  • ‘Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey said the family that owns the drug company Purdue Pharma is personally responsible for the company’s role in the opioid crisis’   purdue-‘pharma-family-oxycontin-abuse
  • Back in 2007 fraudulent promotion of OxyCotin resulted in a $600million fine for Purdue plus personal fines for the executives responsible. Perhaps this will now be an outbreak of litigation addiction.

Concerns Beyond Charity

  • Other drugs in widespread use in the UK including fentanyl, tramadol and methadone are prone to causing addiction and other health problems.
  • The United States is in the midst of a drug crisis, with dramatic increases in the rate of opioid overdose deaths. Australia’s drug research center says ‘Powerful opioid fentanyl poses serious risk of fatal overdose’. Wake up UK it is also happening here!
  • Can charity and business mix?
  • Who has the ability to police and prevent corporate and personal abuse of such powerful narcotics. Charities are left to pick up the pieces.

480 Year Old Wade’s Trust Leeds


This is a locally focused charity founded in 1530’s which owns large areas of open spaces & parks in Leeds.

Wade’s Charity  provides grants to registered charities and community groups across Leeds, funded by the £8.2million cash and investments held in trust by the charity. There is also a schedule of properties and maintained open spaces within the pre-1974 Leeds city boundary leased to Leeds Council. One example is ‘ Land with frontages to Ellerby Road, Morpeth Place, Zion  Street and Bow Street commonly called Smithies Garth were donated to the charity in 1898’ Other land at Gotts Park, Gledow Valley, Middleton and Kirkstall were green spaces acquired in the last century.

Grants are made to other charities within the pre-1974 city boundary of Leeds to support ‘facilities for recreation, amusement, entertainment and general social intercourse for citizens of every age of areas of population in the City of Leeds occupied in the main by the working classes including in any such objects the establishment of what are commonly known as Community Centres and Youth Centres’.


  • After almost half a millennium it is probably best to leave well alone for the trust to continue it’s good work.
  • The accounts submitted to the charity commission, the website and reports on grants made are very open and to be commended.
  • As with other ‘local’ organisations there is  a danger that more affluent areas are able to obtain more resources from such charities as Wades. This is partially due to their ability to envisaging larger schemes and having the local nous or chutzpah to ask for more.